Jeju City website privacy policy drafting: 3 hidden pitfalls most foreign founders miss
💡 律咖编者按:
本文由律咖网社群读者 succulent 投稿分享。
为了方便大家阅读,律咖网编辑 JingJing(微信:lvga2015)对原文进行了细致的逻辑润色与合规性整理。希望能给正在 韩国 创业路上的你带来真实的参考。
I’m not a lawyer. I’m not even a tech founder. I run a small company that designs school infrastructure in Southeast Asia — and last year, I got curious about launching a simple Jeju-based digital guide for foreign teachers and expat families. Just a website. A blog. Maybe an app. Nothing fancy.
But when I started drafting the privacy policy? I hit a wall.
Not because the law was too complex.
Not because I didn’t speak Korean.
But because I assumed: “If it’s just a website, it doesn’t matter.”
I was wrong.
And I wasn’t alone.
In the past six months, I’ve talked to over a dozen foreign entrepreneurs in Jeju — from digital nomads running Etsy shops to language app developers — and nearly all of them made the same three mistakes when handling privacy policies. Not because they were careless. But because the system doesn’t tell you where to look.
This isn’t about fines. It’s about trust.
Here’s what I learned — broken down, not as advice, but as variables.
一、表层现象:以为“没有用户数据” = “不需要隐私政策”
The most common assumption?
“We don’t collect emails. No login. No payment. Just static info. So we don’t need a privacy policy.”
I thought that too.
Then I read the UPI study from March 31, 2026:
“Apple privacy labels often conflict with policy and UI evidence. Twenty-six apps claimed in their privacy labels that they did not collect any data used to track users. Their privacy policies disclosed third-party SDK usage for monitoring and analytics.”
Even if your website is just HTML and CSS — if it loads Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, or even a simple cloud-hosted comment plugin (like Disqus or Utterances) — you are collecting data.
In Korea, under the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), any automated collection of IP addresses, device IDs, or browsing behavior — even via third-party scripts — counts as “personal information.”
You don’t need a user account. You don’t need a form.
Just loading a script from a server outside Korea? That’s a data transfer.
And under PIPA, that triggers disclosure obligations.
Mistake #1: Thinking “no form = no data.”
Reality: The browser sends data. Always.
二、隐藏变量:Jeju isn’t “special” — it’s part of Korea’s national data regime
Many assume Jeju Special Self-Governing Province has looser rules.
It doesn’t.
PIPA applies nationwide.
Jeju’s autonomy applies to taxation, tourism promotion, and some business licensing — not data privacy.
What’s different?
The enforcement tone.
In Jeju, foreign-run small businesses are often overlooked — not because they’re exempt, but because regulators prioritize large-scale violations.
That creates a false sense of safety.
But here’s the hidden variable: Apple App Store and Google Play Store require a privacy policy for any app that collects data — even if it’s just a static guide.
If you plan to publish an app (even a simple one for Jeju travel tips), and you skip the policy?
Your app gets rejected.
And if you launch a website first, then later build an app?
You’ll have to retrofit the policy — and users may question your credibility.
I saw this happen to a Canadian couple running a Jeju hiking guide app.
They launched without a policy. Got rejected on App Store.
Then tried to add one — but copied a template from a US site.
Apple flagged it for “incomplete data sharing disclosures.”
Took them 3 weeks to fix it.
Mistake #2: Assuming local silence = legal exemption.
Reality: App stores enforce global standards. And they’re watching.
三、制度逻辑:Korea’s data system is built on “transparency by default”
Korea’s PIPA isn’t like GDPR.
It’s stricter in some ways.
Under PIPA, you must:
- Disclose every third-party service that receives data (even if it’s just Google Fonts).
- List how long data is retained — “until user deletes” isn’t enough. You must specify a timeframe.
- Allow deletion requests within 10 business days — no exceptions.
- Provide Korean-language versions if your service is targeted at Korean residents.
The example from the UPI study is telling:
“A township-linked app stored residents’ video feeds indefinitely on jointly operated servers and restricted deletion without official approval.”
That’s a violation — and it got public attention.
What’s worse?
Korean regulators don’t need to prove intent.
If your policy says “we don’t track,” but your code does?
That’s fraud.
You don’t need to be malicious.
You just need to be unaware.
The 450-page visa guide on hikorea.go.kr?
It’s in Korean only.
The privacy policy section?
It’s buried in Chapter 12.
No English version.
No summary.
So foreign founders rely on templates — and those templates are usually built for US or EU markets.
They miss Korea’s specific requirements.
Mistake #3: Using a “global” template without local validation.
Reality: Korea requires granular specificity. Vague language = non-compliance.
四、创业者视角:我该怎么做?不是“合规”,是“可信”
I didn’t want to hire a Korean lawyer for a $500 website.
I didn’t want to spend $3,000 on legal fees.
So here’s what I did — step by step — with zero legal background:
✅ Step 1: Map your data flow
List every external service your website uses:
- Google Analytics?
- Cloudflare?
- Comment system?
- Payment gateway?
- CDN?
Write down what data each one receives.
IP? Location? Device type? Browsing behavior?
Use this free tool: https://cookiebot.com — it scans your site and lists trackers.
Not perfect — but better than guessing.
✅ Step 2: Build your policy around PIPA’s 3 pillars
Use this structure:
- What data we collect → List every item, even cookies.
- Why we collect it → “To improve user experience” is acceptable. Avoid “for marketing.”
- How we protect it → “Stored on encrypted servers in South Korea.” If you use overseas servers, say so — and mention PIPA’s cross-border transfer rules.
Don’t say: “We may share with partners.”
Say: “We use Google Analytics for traffic analysis. Google’s privacy policy: [link]. We do not share user data with third parties for advertising.”
✅ Step 3: Publish it in Korean AND English
Even if your site is English-only, you must offer a Korean version of the policy if your service is accessible to Korean users.
You can use AI to translate — but get a native Korean speaker to verify.
A bad translation is worse than no policy.
I used a freelancer on Upwork (Korean native, 3 years in compliance) for $80.
Worth every won.
✅ Step 4: Add a deletion button
Even if you don’t collect data — make it easy to delete.
Add a link: “Request data deletion” → send to a simple email (e.g., privacy@yourdomain.com).
Respond within 10 days.
Keep a log.
This isn’t legally required for tiny sites — but it builds trust.
And trust is your real asset.
❓ FAQ
Q1: Can I use a free privacy policy generator for my Jeju website?
A:
- ✅ Use it to draft.
- ❌ Don’t rely on it.
- ✅ Steps:
- Use https://www.privacypolicygenerator.info
- Input every service you use (check Cookiebot scan)
- Replace “EU GDPR” with “Korea PIPA”
- Add: “Data retention period: 12 months, or until user deletion request.”
- Translate to Korean using DeepL → have a native speaker review
- Publish both versions on your site footer.
- ✅ Key point: If you use Google Analytics, you must link to Google’s privacy policy and state you are not responsible for their practices.
Q2: Do I need to register my website with Korean authorities?
A:
- ❌ No registration is required for small websites.
- ✅ But if you collect personal data from Korean residents (even one person), you must:
- Appoint a “Personal Information Protection Manager” (can be you)
- Maintain a “Processing Record” (a simple Excel sheet: what data, why, how long)
- Respond to deletion requests within 10 days
- 📌 Official guide: hikorea.go.kr — search “PIPA” in Korean.
- 💡 Tip: Use Google Translate + Korean keywords: “개인정보보호법” + “운영자 의무”
Q3: What if I only target foreigners in Jeju?
A:
- PIPA applies if your service is “accessible to Korean residents.”
- Even if you write in English, if someone from Seoul can access your site — you’re covered.
- If you’re 100% targeting only non-Koreans (e.g., only English speakers with foreign passports), you may have a weaker obligation —
but Apple/Google still require a policy for app submission. - Best practice: Always have one.
- It costs less than a rejected app submission.
✅ 4 Actionable Takeaways (for non-lawyers)
- Assume every script = data collection — even Google Fonts.
- Never copy a US/EU template — Korea requires specific retention periods and third-party disclosures.
- Publish both English and Korean versions — even if your site is only in English.
- Add a simple “Delete My Data” email — it takes 5 minutes to set up and builds trust faster than any legal clause.
I didn’t fix this because I wanted to be “legal.”
I fixed it because I wanted to be trusted.
In Jeju, where tourists and expats are the lifeblood of small businesses — your reputation is your only real asset.
A poorly written privacy policy doesn’t just risk fines.
It makes people wonder:
“If they don’t care about privacy — what else are they hiding?”
That’s the real cost.
💡 如果你也在韩国创业,正在起草网站隐私政策、处理用户数据、或担心App审核被拒,欢迎在评论区留言你的具体场景。
我和律咖网编辑 JingJing(微信:lvga2015)会定期整理大家的共性问题,做成下一期的“跨境合规避坑指南”。
没有标准答案,但我们可以一起看清变量。
🔸 延伸阅读
🔸 S. Korea to remove ‘China (Taiwan)’ label from e-arrival system after Taiwan’s protest 🗞️ 来源: UPI – 📅 2026-03-31
🔗 阅读原文
🔸 Apple privacy labels often conflict with policy and UI evidence 🗞️ 来源: UPI – 📅 2026-03-31
🔗 阅读原文
🔸 This immersive dining experience from Jeju, Korea is now in Singapore – we tried it, and here’s our review 🗞️ 来源: Timeout – 📅 2026-03-31
🔗 阅读原文
请知悉:律咖网(Lvga.com)是跨境创业公开信息与内容分享平台,不提供法律、税务、会计或合规服务。
本文内容基于公开资料,并由人工编辑与 AI 工具协助整理,仅供信息参考之用,不构成任何法律、投资、移民或商业决策建议。
政策可能随时间变化,请以官方渠道与当地持牌专业人士意见为准。
如内容有需要修订之处,欢迎随时与我联系。
